Yeah…
Notice he totally disregarded most of what I said though …
I haven’t a clue as to what he actually said.
I’m lost now. *
I can’t engage someone in discussion when they totally disregard what I’m trying to say and go into some political tirade.
Good tactic though. Send a ton of useless information down the line as to totally give one’s opponent “information overload”, which causes the targets of said tactic to go into total brain lock and totally fail to come up with any answer whatsoever.
- = See above… Total brain lock. I have determined Mike is so far in a different plane of reality that I simply cannot in any way come up with any direct answers to his messages. I am at a total loss.
I know I’m joining this thread rather late, but Mike uses the same tired tactics that other pirate broadcasters have tried (and failed) over the years: claiming that the FCC lacks authority (total BS - the Communications Act of 1934 was a legitimate act of Congress creating the FCC, and empowering it to create such rules as necessary to regulate communications, and to enforce those rules); that rules aren’t the same as laws (find me a judge who’ll say that you can just ignore the Code of Federal Regulations…); that the FCC can’t make arrests (so what? The US Marshall’s Service can and does, on the FCC’s behalf); that the only important thing is non-interference (???); attacking his detractors as uneducated, etc, etc, etc. His carefully edited snippet of the judgement from his 1976 case is totally meaningless without the full text of the original complaint, and he obviously had to delete certain parts not favorable to his argument. I’ve got my sister-in-law, a Cornell law prof, looking up the original FCC enforcement action and subsequent District Court transcripts for me… should prove interesting! (she thinks Mike’s “logic” is hysterically funny!)
Mike, don’t bother replying - I am not the least bit interested in reading any more of your off-the-wall justifications for your actions.
Danny, I respectfully request that you delete all of Mike’s postings where he advocates unlicensed operation, that he be barred from any future such posts, and that he be totally banned if he will not agree to stop giving bad legal advice.